You should run the numbers with your tire size first, see where 8th puts you. 4.10's and 35's [34.6 in my case] works out to high 3.30's range. Pretty close to the 3.21's and 31.5's that were stock on these trucks as far as 1:1 RPM.
Even on my 20 Warlock 55-65 on a two lane road it often does better in 7th. I only have 3.21s so the down shift out of 8th is more common. And in Auto it tends to skip to 5th or 6th on hills. 3.55 is probably better but 3.92 may be over kill for my 2wd, except I’ll be towing a travel trailer by next year so it may be worth it.
When I swap a 5.7 or 6.4 (truck) into the Ramcharger I’ll probably step down to 4.10 from the 4.56 regardless of if I stick with the NV4500 or go to the 8HP70.
It was averaging closer to 26% throttle and the vacuum was correspondingly lower, as was the timing advance. I assume the cruise closed the throttle a bit just as the pic was taken.I find the vacuum readings interesting. The lower reading to me would indicate the engine is working harder at the lower RPM. But the throttle I take it is relatively the same, going by the 24 & 23 readings. My gut feeling is the higher vacuum is the better mileage, but I cannot wrap my brain around the same throttle.
The trick question is how do you determine the sweet spot of an engine for fuel mileage, and for power. Some dynos will give the fuel consumption for the various RPM's at full throttle. But what if you only need the engine to produce 100HP to keep it rolling down the road? How do you come up with the best RPM, and decide gear choices.
It is an expression of pulse width in MS, higher meaning a longer on time.Peak torque, Peak HP, and minimum fuel consumption are easy to find. but that is not the real world. Back in the 60's it was easy, most engines were giving their all to keep the vehicle moving, so you could look at the fuel specific consumption curve and get a good setup. Today we only push the engines when accelerating. So finding the cruise minimum fuel consumption is not so simple.
What does that number for injection mean?
It can be construed as that, yes. More fuel but fewer revs, or more revs with less fuel. It may be six one way and half a dozen the other.So then can it be thought of as a instantaneous fuel use number? But, I guess not because you need to take the lower RPM into account. HMMM.